The un-lodged Mason

My good friend and Brother Frederic Milliken wrote an article entitled Message to the un-lodged Mason.  In the article, Fred discussed the importance of attending lodge and the advantages of having personal interaction with other Freemasons.  l generally agree with Fred’s conclusion on this subject and believe that attending lodge functions is essential to the Masonic experience, but I also can identify with the plight of what Fred calls the un-lodged Mason.

Fred correctly compares the un-lodged Mason to the Christian who does not attend church. This is a fair comparison because it is my opinion that the purpose and structure of Masonry is much more similar to that of a religious organization than that of a community organization. So why do some Christians not attend church? Many Christians do not attend church because the goals of the church may not match the goals of the worshiper. Some churches have an all or nothing approach to dogma and require that you agree with the church’s opinion on every matter. Other churches continually ask for more and more out of their volunteers which eventually sucks all of the enthusiasm out of the those in the congregation that offer their time and resources. Then, there are also those worshipers that attend service or Bible study searching for answers to their complex questions about spirituality and that constantly receive replies that are either not straightforward or that sidestep the question all together. This constant cycle of a church not aligning with the individual worshiper’s values, requiring him to over-commit to the organization and not providing him with the spiritual knowledge he seeks results in the Christian walking away from the congregation.

Not surprisingly, this is exactly what occurs in our Masonic lodges as well !

Numerous individual Masons have been turned away from the lodge because he brought new ideas to the assembly and was told that “this isn’t how we have done it before.” Lodges often volunteer their young, enthusiastic members for every task  which inevitably interferes with that member’s family and vocational responsibilities. Finally, many men come to the Masonic lodge looking for a method of self-improvement and enlightenment and find an organization that neglects education almost entirely.unlodged freemason

Freemasonry often plays a big role in the lives of un-lodged Masons.    Continue reading The un-lodged Mason

Mediocrity in Freemasonry

How long have we been talking about boring business meetings, poor food, and lousy fellowship and run down Masonic buildings? We don’t seem to learn from our mistakes nor do we seem capable of doing what the ancient mystery schools were most adept at doing, namely providing knowledge that lead to wisdom leading to actually making a better man. We don’t teach Masonic philosophy anymore and for that reason many Masons don’t know that we are a very special and unique society.

One of the questions that occasionally eats at me when I am driving home from a Masonic event that has been woefully mediocre is how our members can sit through such Masonic happenings month after month and still believe our fraternity is relevant and meaningful to men’s lives? How honest are we in claiming we make good men better while persistently repeating practices and behaviors which are so distinctively average, or worse?

Continue reading Mediocrity in Freemasonry

What makes a successful Lodge?

This subject comes up time and time again. It is almost as if Freemasonry is trying to find an identity that fits our modern times. So, even if  we may have touched this topic in the past I feel it is in the interest of all of us Freemasons to keep seeking for ways that will bring into the Craft,  Freemasons who do not ever regret having joined the Brotherhood.

The Reverend Maxell-Ware ‘s article is only partially shared by me so I have resumed it and taken away those parts I disagree with. But it is, nevertheless,  an interesting paper.
Have a good read!

=== *** ===

Firstly, it is important to ascertain what the definition of a successful lodge is. Has a successful lodge a large number of members, a healthy contribution to charity, excellent ritual or longevity ?

Continue reading What makes a successful Lodge?

CONFESSIONS OF A BYGONE FREEMASON

A fortnight ago I  published the letter of a Spanish Freemason who criticized  the current state of the Grand Lodge of his Country and castigated the actions of its leader.  This time  I am  submitting  for  your reading  an article by  an anonymous English former Brother,  that The Square magazine published in its issue of September 2016.

The author of it does quite a good  self analysis of the reasons  he resigned from the Craft. He has also listed the justifications  – and there are many ! – that other brothers told him they had  for quitting Freemasonry and never return to it.

It makes an interesting reading .

Aldo Reno

Why I left Freemasonry

I met the editor of the  magazine The Square  at a formal dinner, where he learned that I had been a Freemason but had severed all ties with it and he persuaded me to write down the real reasons for leaving the Craft.

Here is my story.

l joined Freemasonry after meeting the owner of a shop in my town. We got on well together and  I bought various  books from him.  From time to time we would also talk about Freemasonry ,  provided that no one else was on the premises. He was quite a keen Brother and he wondered if I might be interested.  I had no connection at all to Freemasonry and no one in my family had ever been  a member of the Order,  but after reading about it (the good and the bad) I  decided to join and  find out for myself.

 My problems started very quickly.

At my Initiation,I could hardly stop myself from laughing aloud when the penalties were presented. What nonsense! However, after my second degree I became very involved and went into offices and visited quite a lot.  I also attended a research lodge, which was usually quite boring, and I even went to a Masonic conference.  I met some members who I got on with and whose company l enjoyed, but unfortunately none of them were in the lodge I belonged to.

I started to become bored and disenchanted with what I was experiencing and with the people I was in the lodge with. When I quietly talked with others from different lodges about it , I found that quite a few of them felt the same way.

In time I  joined another lodge and a Chapter.

The second lodge was a little better than my first  but I found  the  ritual of the Royal Arch Chapter  virtually incomprehensible. No one could explain what any of it meant.

l began to miss meetings and eventually I just resigned from all my lodges. I don’t think I was missed at all. When I left I was asked to give my reasons and  I gave a politically correct answer on the line that l did not have the time to participate properly  because my work commitments had to take priority. They accepted my excuse  because I think they were not really that bothered whether I stayed or I left.

Over the next few years, I met many men who had also left Freemasonry. Some of them had not even been asked why they were leaving,  or the question was put  to them  in a way that showed that the questioner was only going through the motions of asking.

I  enquiried  those former brothers  for  the real reason(s)  they had  left the Craft and I have reported them at the end of this article. Most of what I have listed , however, is drawn from the  memory I have retained  of the conversations held because I obviously did not keep notes or write down what the brothers were saying.

My recollections are that there were those who had enjoyed Freemasonry but whose  circumstance had caused them to fall away. For example, they  had moved to another locality where it was more difficult to get to a lodge; they had become  ill and thus did  not attend  for quite a while and just got  out of the habit;  they had  a wife to care for; had changed their job or the membership of their lodge had changed and their mates were no longer attending.  I could not talk with the dead but some commented that with the death of some of  their brother(s)  their interest had declined. Many had reached a point where they were paying subscriptions and never attending and since in many cases the subscriptions included the cost of  a meal – their financial loss was high. There were some younger men who really did have to put work before Freemasonry because the lodge meeting times and places were such that they could not get there.  For someone who worked 9-5 in an office, it would be very difficult to get leave earlier.

But I also heard of many other reasons and some of them  were similar to my own thoughts. Perhaps it is  best if I just list them , but please bear in mind that these  are not exact quotes.

  • The membership is too old and stuck in its ways. I don’t want to spend my evenings with pedantic old men.
  • The whole thing is too pompous – all that bowing and scraping to people who are nobody.
  • It is too hierarchic. Decisions are just made and imposed – yet I pay to belong to this.
  • There are too many pontificating hypocrites. Senior people are shown to be very questionable – but they really do not like to be questioned.
  • There is so much politicking and back-biting going on.
  • The ritual is too old fashioned and frankly often stupid. Many say it but do not believe it. I know plenty that do not believe in God, for example.
  • It is far too religious – if I want the Bible and prayers, I can go to church.
  • We do the same thing over and over again (usually badly). Does anybody ever talk about it?
  • The whole thing is far too time-consuming. It can take over your life.
  • The meals are poor, the speeches are worse and we have to do the same thing over again every time.
  • The members are not important in the community. Most are really nobody. Some are worse – we had two alcoholics in my lodge and one member committed suicide. So much for love and support!
  • I can use my time in other ways and  much better. They got really upset when I did not want to spend months learning ritual – yet we never had a candidate.  What is the point?
  • I am tired of always being asked for more charity – where does it really go ?
  • All those ranks and titles for people who have never done anything.
  • Some can’t even open and close a lodge. The intellectual level is very poor.
  • The same people seem to have been running it for years – are they ever asked to take responsibility for problems?
  • The sucking up to get higher rank is very sad and shameful.
  • What is the point of Freemasonry? What is it really trying to provide? It seems to be wanting to be all things to all people and it finishes up doing much of it badly.
  • It had no relevance in my life especially as it largely does not involve my wife or family. It brings no benefits.
  • It seems to be living  in the past. They are always talking about the great Masons who lived centuries ago.
  • Our Hall is of poor quality. I am not happy taking my wife and friends there.
  • My friends just laughed when they knew I was a Freemason; it is seen as ridiculous by quite a few and others have such wild ideas about it. I tried to tell them we were not Satanists or esoteric nutters but then you read books written by Freemasons themselves which are ludicrous.

 (…)This is the reality of what ex-Freemasons confided  to me. I realise that some may have had isolated experiences and their dissatisfaction was not  ‘all or nothing”.  However, these are the issues that were raised and the end result had been in all cases that those Freemasons had eventually left. Not one of them ever said to me that they missed it and wished they had stayed.   I did learn very quickly that large numbers do leave and that there is a steady decline every year.

I was also asked by the magazine’s editor what would have kept me in Freemasonry, as he, like many others, seems to be happy and very involved in it. The answer to that is that I am not sure. l think that at the core, my membership was not leading to anything that had any value or meaning for me. It did not help me spiritually. Socially I did meet some new people but I only ever invited one to my home and this is the only person I have kept as a friend. The lodge rhetoric did not seem to be translated into real action. When I left, there were members of the lodge I had never met.  I suppose I expected Freemasonry to benefit me in some way and as it never did , I became frustrated.

I think that change, if it ever happens, will have to come at the lodge level with every member committed to being part of a supportive brotherhood, which must continue outside  the lodge. This is not easy when you do not choose the members of the lodge you join. There are enough problems in families to show how similar problems can arise.  Maybe I joined the wrong lodge – but there were plenty of other brothers who seemed to have joined the wrong lodges too.

I think I expected that Freemasonry  wanted much more of me and  that it  would have  provided  the proper support. What ,instead , I found was that I was on my own !  and so I met with strangers every so often and met them again some time later to go through the same routines.

I just got bored with it all.

How can the lodge and the officers live  with this?  Perhaps one starts  by admitting the problems and then admitting that most are caused by the members and the rulers themselves. I suspect that some simple things could be done immediately like, for example,  let  everybody wear a simple white apron – no decorations.  It would be a lot cheaper for many but I think it would also send out a clear message that we are all equal brothers.

I also would remove all the religious trappings and present  Freemasonry  simply as a moral organisation.

I think lodges need to carry out  projects in the community ; doing  good would unite its members.  I would also involve wives and families far more than they are now.  But most of all you need to have the courage to jump on any member who is strayìng from the Masonic principles – for example  anyone who is backstabbing, is being derogatory, is  finding faults in everything and every brother. Freemasons, therefore, need to be very careful in who becomes a member.  Frankly, for me  I think it is too late and I am sorry to say that, whatever the Freemasons  do, it will never include me again.

THE TROUBLE WITH THE GRAND LODGE OF SPAIN AND THE ENGLISH FACTOR

On March 15th CY, the English language weekly newspaper for British expats who live on the Costa Blanca – appropriately called Costa News –   published a letter to the Editor that has captivated me.  Its contents is harshly critical of the situation of Freemasonry in Spain and it must have taken a large measure of courage for the author to have exposed himself and for  being so disapproving of the GLE.

The letter in question is titled Freemasonry: The Grand Lodge of Spain. It is likely to  have been originally written in Spanish by a Spanish Brother but then translated into English language using a free translator software.

Having adjusted the grammar form and condensed the letter,   I am now re-proposing its contents for your consideration. But let me inform the readers that the views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the text  of the letter belong solely to its author and that the publication of such letter on this website does not necessarily imply  that Tetraktys endorses the opinions expressed therein .

Have a good reading!

Aldo Reno

***

Finestrat, March 12

We are living moments of increasing internal tension in the Grand Lodge of Espana (GLE) as it is moving towards self-destruction.

Of its three Past Grand Masters, two are no longer members of the GLE and all of them are in total disagreement with the current Grand Master.

There are two fundamental problems that need to be resolved, of which the first is the GLE’s current leadership. Continue reading THE TROUBLE WITH THE GRAND LODGE OF SPAIN AND THE ENGLISH FACTOR

Freemasonry and membership retention

In an article that Freemasonry.com published last month , a Brother from the United States of America  writes about the issue of  diminishing masonic membership in his Country. Why should we in England  be concerned ? Because unless measures are taken that go beyond a soft recruitment campaign , even Freemasonry on this side of the Atlantic Ocean will experience a similar crisis.

It is not that  Freemasonry isn’t pure in its aims, its values and beliefs ; just that  those assemblies of good men who meet on the square  , resemble more and        more social clubs rather than  Masonic lodges.

Recently – says Bro. Milliken – Freemasons are dismayed at all the talks of membership, lodge dues, dress, Grand edicts and other issues that they believe bring (…) undue debates and divisions in the Craft.

For them the symbolism, the virtues, morality and the positive effect that all of these things have on our soul, are the only things that should be talked about within the Masonic community.

They are the Philosophical or Intellectual Masons.

Who cares where we meet, they say, or what we look like and how many of us are present at our meetings (…). They see Freemasonry as a philosophy that can exists regardless of its structure because a philosophy requires no administration or infrastructure. It requires thought, enlightenment and personal practice   without incumbencies. It does not need a building or a leader or any authority imposed on it. Freemasonry is indestructible; it is a personal journey (…) that only requires a personal commitment to its ideals and life changing message.

On the other side of the divide we have the Structural & Administrative Freemasons, who tell us that (…) a Society, a Brotherhood without structure is anarchy. Indeed it ceases to be a Brotherhood because what is lost is the interpersonal relationship, the personal contact, the camaderie.

(…) But if you are going to have infrastructure like a temple, a ritual, a dogma, a catechism, a leadership, then – say those Masons – you are going to have rules and enforcement. Membership dues, budgets, dress, qualifications, etc. thus become justifiable issues.

Continue reading Freemasonry and membership retention

Freemasonry under the Vichy Regime (1940-44)

For well over a century the larger part of Freemasonry in the French republic has not been recognised as regular by the United Grand Lodge of England, and by most other adherents to what has been described as “the American-English” style of Freemasonry. The reasons for this are largely well-known, and are chiefly connected with the abandoning, in 1870, by The Grand National Orient de France, the oldest and largest masonic group in France, of a requirement to believe in a Supreme Being as a prerequisite for Initiation into the Order. Further problems of recognition have continued to crop up in more recent times, right up to 2007.

Related to this is the fact that whereas our institution has sedulously ensured its apolitical nature over the past three centuries – we can all recollect being adjured in the Charge After Initiation to “refrain from all political and religious discussion” – French Freemasonry has been characterised by a readiness to express, as a body, official lines on all manner of political, social and cultural issues. This preparedness to put their heads above the parapet in such an open way has, I fear, led to a feeling in some quarters that the persecution of such a conspicuous organisation was inevitable under a totalitarian dictatorship, and almost courted.

I hope that the present paper will redress some of that neglect, and I would like to think that it may serve Freemasons of whatever background two useful functions: firstly, it will preserve the memory of the many thousands of French Freemasons who were brutally persecuted during the German occupation of France and secondly it will provide us with a picture of what would have happened had our island been invaded by Nazi Germany, a picture which is an extension of the fate of Freemasonry in the Channel Islands which has previously been  described eloquently in this lodge.

Background: the Fall of France

France declared war on Germany on 3rd September 1939, at the same time as Britain, in accordance with the terms of the Franco-Polish Military Alliance of 1921, which, like the Anglo-Polish Alliance, required French support against the invasion of Poland by Germany on 1st September.

There followed some eight months of what is now referred to as the “Phoney War”, (Drole de Guerre or Sitzkrieg) during which neither Britain nor France launched any significant land offensives against German forces.

This ended on 10th May 1940, with the invasion by Germany of the Low Countries, drawing in the British Expeditionary Force which had been stationed on the French side of the border of neutral Belgium since October 1939. Over the next few days, German armour and troops poured into France on two main fronts, supported by the Luftwaffe, and in spite of initial stiff resistance by some French divisions, they easily overwhelmed the less well-equipped and trained French. The B.E.F. retreated to Dunkirk, and was of course evacuated in Operation Dynamo between 27’” May and 4th  June.

The French government was in a crisis of indecision: Prime Minister Paul Reynaud wanted the government to flee abroad, to French North Africa, and to continue the war from there, supported by the formidable French Navy.

He was opposed by the Commander in Chief of French forces, General WeygandWeygand_10_30_33_cropped, and the Deputy Prime Minister Marshall Philippe Petain. Churchill flew to France on 11th June to meet Reynaud, Petain and Weygand; he discussed with them the defence of Paris by guerrilla warfare and house-to-house fighting, not knowing that Weygand had already ordered that Paris, which by now was almost deserted, be surrendered to the Germans. Petain and Weygand, who shared right-wing, anti-republican authoritarian and vehemently anti-communist views, were concerned that if the government went abroad the country would be broken up and easy prey for German and Italian colonisation. They wanted the French forces to retain enough power to repel communist overthrow. When Churchill returned to England that evening, it was clear that France was about to fall. He returned to Tours on 13th June, and Reynaud asked for a release from a previous agreement that he would not seek an armistice with the Germans without Britain’s consent.

German troops entered Paris unopposed on 14th June. Reynaud was in Bordeaux with the rest of the fleeing government, and resigned as Prime Minister. On 16th June, President Albert Lebrun appointed Marshal Pertain as his successor.

Enter ParisOn 22nd June an Armistice, the Second Compiegne Agreement, was signed with Germany. The Northern and Western parts of France, constituting about 60% of the country, were occupied by Germany. The remainder was under the direct French control of a new government based in the town of Vichy. Both the Zone Libre (Vichy) and the Zone Occupee (North and West) were nominally under the control of the Vichy government. One of the conditions of reaching the armistice was that France would not have its territory divided up between Germany and Italy. The demarcation lines existed until the invasion of North Africa by the Allies in Operation Torch on 8th November 1942, when Germany took control of the whole of France.

On the 10th July the government in Vichy voted Marshal Petain “extraordinary powers” effectively making him President and an absolute ruler. Petain appointed Pierre Laval as his Prime Minister.

The Germans in many ways “left the French to it”. Much of the Vichy administration comprised of men like Petain, who were reactionary, anti-republican, anti-democratic, and vehemently anti-Semitic, and favoured an authoritarian and Draconian regime. Without specific instructions from the Germans, they instituted policies of persecution, internment and deportation of Jews, Gypsies, Protestants, homosexuals and Freemasons.

Persecution of Freemasons

The Third Reich already had a long history of anti-Masonic activity, and this was quickly expoused by the Vichy government. In addition to the belief that Freemason and Jews were involved in plots for world domination, there was also a conviction that lodges were the owners of untold treasures, which would be confiscated by the Reich.

Continue reading Freemasonry under the Vichy Regime (1940-44)

Freemasonry : The Test of Time

The following  words of warning by the Editor of a Masonic magazine two centuries old , show how transcendent the danger for our Order is.  Freemasonry membership is a privilege that should be bestowed on an aspiring man who is not only of  good character  but who can demonstrate to  be a resourceful individual , able to apply himself to  the the study  and understanding of our symbology .  It should not be enough for the candidate to be a “buddy”.  If Freemasonry continues to open its  doors and disclose its secrets to the vain, casual, trivial, curiousity seeker , then  the eternal teaching will be wasted on the unworthy and lost.

The Test of Time

The privileges of Freemasonry have been made too common !  They have been bestowed upon the worthless and the wicked and the reputation of the Society has been injured.

Only true and good men of good report ought to be honored with them.

Every Freemason should be particularly careful to recommend none as Candidates for our mysteries but such whose characters will answer the description.

The Freemasons Magazine (January 1794)

Los orígenes de la Masonería

En 1730, Samuel Pritchard, miembro de una logia constituida en Inglaterra, publicó un tratado titulado Masonería Discreta; e hizo un juramento ante el Lord Mayor de Londres que era una copia verdadera. « Samuel Pritchard hace el juramento de que la obra anexa era un ejemplar verdadero y genuino en cada detalle ». En su trabajo, ha dado el catecismo o examen, en pregunta y respuesta, de los Aprendices, el Compañero de Artesania y el Maestro Masón. No hubo dificultad para hacer esto, ya que es una mera forma.

« En su introducción », dice, « la institución original de la Masonería consistió en la fundación de las artes liberales y las ciencias, pero más especialmente en geometría, ya que en la construcción de la torre de Babel,

The idea of a universal human language goes back at least to the Bible, in which humanity spoke a common tongue, but were punished with mutual unintelligibility after trying to build the Tower of Babel all the way to heaven. Now scientists have reconstructed words from such a language.

el arte y el misterio de la Masonería se introdujeron por primera vez, y de allí, transmitido por Euclides, un matemático digno y excelente de los egipcios; y se lo comunicó a Hiram, el Maestro Masón involucrado en la construcción del Templo de Salomón en Jerusalén ».  Además del absurdo de derivar la masonería de la construcción de Babel, donde, según la historia, la confusión de las lenguas impidió que los constructores se entendìeran entre si y, por consiguiente, comunicaran cualquier conocimiento que tuvieran, existe una evidente contradicción en el punto de la cronología en el cuenta que él da.

El Templo de Salomón fue construido y dedicado 1004 años antes de la era cristiana; y Euclides, como se puede ver en las tablas de cronología, vivieron 277 antes de la misma época. Por lo tanto, era imposible que Euclides pudiera comunicarle algo a Hiram, ya que Euclid no vivió hasta 700 años después de la época de Hiram.

En 1783, el Capitán George Smith, inspector de la Real Academia de Artillería en Woolwich, en Inglaterra, y Gran Maestro Provincial de Albañilería para el condado de Kent, publicó un tratado titulado « El Uso y Abuso de la Masonería Libre ».

En su capítulo de la antigüedad de la Masonería, hace que sea coetáneo con la creación, « cuando », dice él, « el arquitecto soberano elevó en los principios masónicos el bello mundo, y ordenó a la ciencia maestra, la Geometría, establecer el mundo planetario , y para regular por sus leyes todo el estupendo sistema en una proporcion justa e infalible, girando alrededor del sol central ».

« Pero », continúa él, « no tengo libertad para descorrer públicamente la cortina, y abiertamente para disentir sobre esta cabeza; es sagrada, y siempre lo será; aquellos que son honrados con la confianza no la revelarán, y aquellos que no lo conocen no pueden traicionarlo ». En esta última parte de la frase, Smith se refiere a las dos clases inferiores, el compañero artesano y el aprendiz inscrito, porque dice en la siguiente página de su obra: “No todos los que apenas se inician en la Masonería libre son a quienes se les confiaron todos los misterios que les pertenecen, no se pueden obtener como cosas por supuesto, ni por cualquier capacidad.

El docto, pero desafortunado Doctor Dodd, Gran Capellán de la Masonería, en

su discurso en la dedicación de Free-Masons Hall, Londres, rastrea la Masonería a través de una variedad de etapas.  Los masones, dice él, están bien informados por sus propios registros privados e

by John Russell, oil on canvas, 1769

interiores de que la construcción del Templo de Salomón esuna era importante, de donde derivan muchos misterios de su arte. «Ahora » ,dice él, « recordemos que este gran evento tuvo lugar más de 1000 años antes de la era cristiana, y en consecuencia más de un siglo antes de que Homero, el primero de los poetas griegos, escribiera, y más de cinco siglos antes de que Pitágoras trajera al este, su sublime sistema de instrucción verdaderamente masónica para iluminar nuestro mundo occidental. Pero, por remoto que sea este período, no nos damos cuenta desde allí del comienzo de nuestro arte. Aunque podría deberse al sabio y glorioso Rey de Israel, algunos de sus muchas formas místicas y ceremonias jeroglíficás, sin embargo, ciertamente el arte mismo es coetáneo con el hombre, el gran tema de la misma ».

« Trazamos »,  continúa él, « sus pasos en las edades y naciones más distantes, más remotas del mundo. Lo encontramos entre los primeros y más famosos civilizadores del este. Lo dedujimos regularmente de los primeros astrónomos de las planicies de Caldea, de los sabios y místicos reyes y sacerdotes de Egipto, de los sabios de Grecia y de los filósofos de Roma ».

A partir de estos informes y declaraciones de los masones de primer orden en la institución, vemos que la Masonería, sin declarar públicamente eso, reclama una comunicación divina del creador, de una manera diferente y desconectada del libro que los cristianos llama a la biblia; y el resultado natural de esto es que la Masonería se deriva de una religión muy antigua, totalmente independiente y desconectada de ese libro.

Para llegar enseguida al grano, se deriva la Masonería (las costumbres, ceremonias, jeroglíficos y cronología  y son  los restos de la religión de los antiguos Druidas; quienes, como los Reyes Magos de Persia y los Sacerdotes de Heliópolis en Egipto, fueron Sacerdotes del Sol. Le rindieron culto a esta gran luminaria, como el gran agente visible de una gran primera causa invisible a quien denominaron «Tiempo sin límites ».

La religión cristiana y la masonería tienen un mismo origen común: ambos se derivan de la adoración del sol. La diferencia entre su origen es que la religión cristiana es una parodia del culto al sol, en la que ponen a un hombre al que llaman Cristo, en el lugar del sol, y le pagan la misma adoración que se pagó originalmente a el Sol, como lo he mostrado en el capítulo sobre el origen de la religión cristiana.»

En la Masonería, muchas de las ceremonias de los Druidas se conservan en su estado original, al menos sin ninguna parodia. Con ellos, el Sol sigue siendo el Sol; y su imagen, en forma de sol, es el gran ornamento emblemático de las logias masónicas y los vestidos masónicos. Es la figura central en sus delantales, y lo usan también colgante en el pecho en sus logias, y en sus procesiones. Tiene la figura de un hombre, como a la cabeza del sol, como Cristo siempre está representado.

En qué período de la antigüedad, o en qué nación, esta religión se estableció por primera vez, se pierde en el laberinto del tiempo no registrado. Generalmente se atribuye a los antiguos egipcios, los babilonios y los caldeos, y luego se redujo a un sistema regulado por el aparente progreso del sol a través de los doce signos del zodiaco por Zoroastro, el legislador de Persia, desde donde Pitágoras lo trajo a Grecia. Es a estos asuntos que el Dr. Dodd se refiere en el pasaje ya citado de su oración.

La adoración del Sol como el gran agente visible de una gran primera causa invisible, « Tiempo sin límites », se extendió por una parte considerable de Asia y África, de allí a Grecia y Roma, através de toda la antigua Galia y en Gran Bretaña y Irlanda.

Smith, en su capítulo sobre la antigüedad de la Masonería en Gran Bretaña, dice que «a pesar de la oscuridad que envuelve la historia masónica en ese país, varias circunstancias contribuyen a probar que la Masonería Libre fue introducida en Gran Bretaña alrededor de 1030 años antes de Cristo ». No puede ser Masonería en su estado actual al que Smith alude aquí. Los Druidas florecieron en Gran Bretaña en el período del que él habla, y es de ellos de donde desciende la Masonería. Smith ha puesto al niño en el lugar del padre.

A veces sucede, tanto en la escritura como en la conversación, que una persona deja escapar una expresión que sirve para desentrañar lo que intenta ocultar, y este es el caso de Smith, porque en el mismo capítulo dice: « Los druidas, cuando se dedicaron a escribir, utilizaron el alfabeto griego y me atrevo a afirmar que los restos más perfectos de los ritos y ceremonias de los druidas se conservan en las costumbres y ceremonias de los masones que se encuentran entre la humanidad ». «Mis hermanos », dice él, «pueden ser capaces de rastrearlos con mayor exactitudde lo que estoy en libertad de explicarle al público ».

Como el estudio y la contemplación del Creador, está en las obras de la creación, el Sol, como el gran agente visible de ese Ser, era el objeto visible de la adoración de los druidas; todos sus ritos religiosos y ceremonias tenían referencia al aparente progreso del Sol a través de los doce signos del Zodiaco y su influencia sobre la tierra. Los masones adoptan las mismas prácticas. El techo de sus Templos o Logias está adornado con un Sol, y el piso esuna representación de la cara abigarrada de la tierra, ya sea mediante alfombras o mosaicos.

Freemasons Hall, en Great Queen Street, Lincolns Inn Fields, Londres, es un magnífico edificio que cuesta más de 12,000 libras esterlinas. Smith, al hablar de este edificio, dice: ‘El techo de este magnifico salón es con toda probabilidad la pieza más alta de arquitectura terminada en Europa. En el centro de este techo, un Sol resplandeciente está representado en oro bruñido, rodeado de los doce signos del zodiaco, con sus respectivos personajes.  El caso es que el día llamado el día de San Juan, es el 24 de Junio, y es lo que se llama el día de San Juan. El sol llega al solsticio de verano; y, con respecto a su altitud meridional, o la altura a mediodía, durante algunos días parece ser de la misma altura. El día astronómico más largo, como el día más corto, no es todos los años, a causa del año bisiesto, en el mismo día numérico, y por lo tanto, el 24 de Junio siempre se toma para el día de verano; y es en honor al sol, que ha llegado a su mayor altura en nuestro hemisferio, y no a San Juan, que este festival anual de los masones, tomado de los druidas, se celebra en pleno verano dia.

Las costumbres a menudo sobrevivirán a la remembranza de su origen, y este es el caso con respecto a una costumbre que todavía se practica en Irlanda, donde los druidas florecieron en el momento en que florecieron en Gran Bretaña. En vísperas del día de San Iuan, es decir, en la víspera del solsticio de verano, la luz irlandesa enciende en lo alto de las colinas. Esto no puede tener ninguna referencia a San Iuan; pero tiene una referencia emblemática del sol, que ese día está en su elevación más alta del verano, y podría decirse que en un lenguaje común llegó a la cima de la colina.

Aunque los masones han tomado muchas de sus ceremonias y jeroglíficos de los antiguos egipcios, es seguro que no han tomado su cronología desde allí. Si lo hubieran hecho, la iglesia los habría enviado pronto a la hoguera; como la cronología de los egipcios, como la de los chinos, va muchos miles de años más allá de la cronología de la Biblia.

La religión de los druidas, como se dijo antes, era la misma que la religión de los antiguos egipcios. druidsLos sacerdotes de Egipto eran los profesores y maestros de la ciencia, y fueron nombrados sacerdotes de Heliópolis, es decir, de la Ciudad del Sol. Los druidas en Europa, que eran del mismo orden que los hombres, tienen su nombre del teutón o antiguo idioma alemán; el alemán que antiguamente se llamaba Teutones. La palabra Druid significa un hombre sabio.

« Egipto », dice Smith, «de donde derivamos muchos de nuestros misterios, siempre ha tenido un rango distinguido  en la historia, y una vez fue celebrado sobre todos los demás por sus antigüedades, su aprendizaje, su opulencia y su fertilidad. En su sistema, sus principales héroes-dioses, Osiris e Isis, representan teológicamente al Ser Supremo y la Naturaleza universal; y fisicamente las dos grandes luminarias celestiales, el Sol y la Luna, por cuya influencia toda la naturaleza actuó. Los hermanos con experiencia de la sociedad, » dice Smith en una nota a este pasaie « estan bien informados sobre la afinidad que estos símbolos tienen con La Masonería, y por que se usan en todas las Logias Masónicas. »  Al hablar de la vestimenta de los masones en sus Logias, parte de la cual, como vemos en sus procesiones públicas, es un delantal de cuero blanco, dice,  « los Druidas eran vestidos de blanco en el momento de sus sacrificios y solemnes oficios. Los sacerdotes egipcios de Osiris usaban algodón blanco como la nieve. El griego y la mayoría de los otros sacerdotes vestían prendas blancas. Como masones, consideramos los principios de aquellos «que fueron los primeros adoradores del Dios verdadero », imitar su vestimenta y asumir la insignia de la inocencia ».

« Los egipcios », continúa Smith, « en las edades mas tempranas constituyeron un gran número de Logias, pero con cuidado asiduo mantuvieron sus secretos de la Masonería de todos los extraños. Estos secretos han sido transmitidos imperfectamente a nosotros por la tradición oral solamente, y deberían mantenerse sin descubrir a los trabajadores, artesanos y aprendices, hasta que con un buen comportamiento y un largo estudio se familiaricen mejor con la geometría y las artes liberales, y así calificados para Maestros y Guardianes, que rara vez o nunca es el caso de los masones ingleses ».

Autor: Bro.Ruber Dario Aguirreche Reye, Venezuela

*** The Real Freemason ***

How can one distinguish a Freemason from other men ?

By his true character, of course !

The real Freemason is distinguished from the rest of mankind by  the unrestrained rectitude of his conduct.

enteredapprenticeOther men are honest in fear of the punishment that the Law might inflict; they are religious in expectation of being rewarded  or in dread of the consequences  in the next world.   A Freemason would be a just man even if there were  no laws,  whether  human or divine !

A Freemason is and remains the same under every climate, under every system of Religion.

He kneelsdemoglas before the throne of God in gratitude for the blessings he has received and in humble solicitations for his future protection. He venerates the good men of all religions; he disturbs not the religion of other men.  He restrains his passions because they cannot be indulged without injuring his neighbor or himself.  He gives no offense because he does not choose to be offended.

A Freemason  is honest upon principle !


Source 

The Farmers Almanac  (1823 edition) Andover, Massachusetts.