The Egyptian Rite of Count Cagliostro

In 1737[1] at the Grand Lodge of France in Paris its Grand Orator the Chevalier Ramsay , enunciated  that the Masonic Order descended from the Knights Templar and was therefore of an exclusively aristocratic nature. Soon after that speech, numerous Masonic High Degrees were founded  all over Europe, each one of them  claiming to be the rightful guardians of some superior secrets  that  came in the form of privileged expression of Spiritualism or Esoterism.

The Egyptian Masonic Order was one of those Higher Degrees and it was founded in France by the self-styled Count Alessandro Cagliostro, akas Giuseppe Balsamo[2] from Palermo, who has remained one of the most enigmatic characters in history.  Considered to be a great magician, alchemist and healer in some circles or a rogue and a charlatan in others, Cagliostro was accused to be part of the famous plot of “L’affaire du collier de la Reine “(Marie Antoinette)[3]  in 1785 at the Court of King Louis XVI. After years of drifting in Europe, the Count ultimately died in 1795 in the gaols of the fortress of San Leo[4] having been sentenced to life imprisonment by the Church Inquisition. Yet with the foundation of the High Degree of The Egyptian Freemasonry, Cagliostro had created something in life that, at least for a while, gave him fame and respect although   later it will also cause his downfall and imprisonment.

Cagliostro had joined the London Lodge “Esperance” on 12th April 1777. However the speed with which he reached the highest degree when he was in England suggests that he had already been initiated elsewhere, probably in Malta in 1776.   In 1784 he travelled to Lyon and took lodgings at the Hotel de la Reine .  There he registered himself under the assumed name of Count Fenice [5]  and asked the most illustrious Freemason in town  to come and meet him. That individual was Jean-Baptiste Willermoz , who later wrote: “I went to see him  two days after his arrival and I went there suspiciously expecting to meet a person called Count Fenice but from his mannerism I soon realised I was in front of  Cagliostro.  He spontaneously admitted his real identity and told me that he had renounced the practice of medicine – which made enemies for him wherever he went – and now wanted  to occupy himself exclusively into instructing selected Freemasons  to the truest Freemasonry of all , that of the Egyptian Rite which teaches to work for the glory of God and the happiness of mankind “.

Continue reading The Egyptian Rite of Count Cagliostro

Was Mozart murdered?

In Vienna’s graveyard, next to the funerary monuments of Schubert and Beethoven, there is also a Memorial dedicated to one of the most distinguished composers of classical music: Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. The visitors keep coming regularly and in large numbers to pay their respect to the music genius, but they do not realize they are victims of a deception: nobody knows precisely where Mozart was actually buried , not even his next of kin.

Mozart was interred with so many others in a common grave with the result that  q few days later his corpse ceased to  be identifiable with some degree of certainty.  His wife Constanze did everything to throw some light onto the enigma that enveloped the composer’s death, but finding herself hampered at every step, she  eventually left both Vienna and Austria. When in later life she married Baron Georg Nikolaus von Nissen, she again set off on her fact finding quest and came to the conclusion that Mozart had been murdered.

Indeed, for an unusual long time the Italian composer Antonio Salieri (1750-1825) had been suspected of  poisoning Mozart. But although Salieri in more than one occasion acted against the interest of our composer, he surely never killed him.

Continue reading Was Mozart murdered?

Freemasonry and Occultism

The evoking the spirit of the dead  was an activity that attracted the interest of people from all social classes in the 18th century, including Freemasons.  At that time many of the Masonic lodges in existence were filled with bored aristocrats with a good majority of them in search of distraction and gratification.

Initially the lodges had only apprentices and companions. It was only in 1724 that a higher degree was introduced and it was one that was inspired by the legend of Hiram Habif, which in turn was based on the even older Egyptian myth of Iris and Osiris. Alchemy scholars of the time could not be anything other than enthusiastic that Hiram’s  legend had been introduced in the Masonic ritual; death and resurrection related well to the processes of death, decomposition and sublimation which are considered essential passages for the base metal’s transmutation journey into (philosophical) gold.

Twenty years after the foundation of the Grand Lodge of England (24.6.1717) the Chevalier Andre’ Michel Ramsay (1686-1743) , an expatriate Scotsman who lived in Paris and  was the Orator of the Lodge “Le Louis d’Argent” , made a famous speech whereby he affirmed that the templarorigin of the Masonic Order and of its secret doctrine were aristocratic. He stated that it were the Knights Templar– religious soldiers drawn from the noblest families in Europe –  who had rediscovered the secret elements of the Masonic teaching during their stay in the Holy Land (the Orient)  and had brought them back  to France and Scotland.

Continue reading Freemasonry and Occultism

The Marquis Arconati Viscont – An eccentric Freemason

In the minutes of the London Lodge “The Nine Muses” is recorded that on 13th February 1783  the “Marquis Paul de Arconati, Viscount of Milano” was admitted as a member.

Since it was founded on 14thJanuary 1977 at the Thatched House Tavern in James’s Street, “The Nine Muses”  Lodge has had a large number of Italians in its lists , so it comes as no surprise that Paul de Arconati fancied it over all the others. The esteemed Chevalier Bartolomeo Ruspini[1]  – jointly with few other respectful characters –  had established “The Nine Muses” and had been its Grand Master in 1976.  His name still appears on a Lodge Certificate dated 1801 as a testimony not only of his longevity but also that he may have been occupying the Chair for period much longer than it is custom nowadays.

But exactly which noble title did Arconati hold, Marquis or Viscount ?

He was a Marquis with the double barrelled family name of Arconati-Visconti/  Perhaps the casual omission of the hyphen in his name might have confounded the Lodge’s secretary and the “Marquis Arconati-Visconti” became the “Marquis Arconati, Viscount of Milano”. It is not uncommon to find in old   Masonic lodge minutes, members’ names which have been recorded with an unintelligible handwriting, are mis-spelt or even incomplete, particularly if those names were foreign.

Paolo Arconati-Visconti was born in 1754 and was the third son of Giangaleazzo Arconati-Visconti, third Marquis of Busto Garolfo[2]and most importantly :  Chamberlain of the Austrian Empress Marie Therese ! The Arconati-Visconti was a family from Milano that even to these days is highly regarded for having been patrons of the arts in its generations.  One of Paolo’s ancestors – Galeazzo Arconati – possessed for a while the collection of Leonardo da Vinci’s sketches known as “The Atlanticus Codex”, which contains some of his futuristic visions on subjects like the flight, new weaponry, mathematics and so forth.  In 1747 Giangaleazzo had married the youngest daughter of the last Baron Scockaert [3]Count of Tirimont , one of the richest and  most influential Flemish aristocrats of the time. The couple moved to Milano in 1750.

In the circle of aristocracy only the first born male child has the right to inherit the title, but Paolo received that privilege following the unexpected death of both his two older siblings. When the Marquis  inherited a large estate in the Flanders he  took off  there and made the Castle of Gaasbeek his summer  residence whilst holding lodgings at the  Hotel De Croy  in the Place Royale, Bruxelles , for when he travelled there on business. It is claimed that he joined the  Lodge “Les Vrais Amis de l’Union” in Bruxelles and that he was involved , whilst there, in many charitable and philanthropic projects.

The Marquis had began his adult life as a captain in the light cavalry regiment of the Hussars, fighting for Austria in the seven years war; a conflict in which all the European nations were involved from 1756 to 1763 and that saw Great Britain and France fighting as usual on opposite sides,  each one forging rather fluid alliances  with other smaller Countries which often swapped sides during the conflict.

The Marquis  travelled far and wide and everywhere he went he studied and immersed himself in the culture of that Country. It was during that time of his life that he visited England and was initiated into Freemasonry. He was a liberal man but his eccentricity was not seen in the right light and  people often assumed  that he was a revolutionary.

Italian by birth, raised in Austria and French by circumstances, he was only able to occupy official government positions after the French revolution of 1795 , when he was elected to represent the department of Dyle.[4]

Paolo greatly admired Napoleon Bonaparte for having successfully  brought order where,after the revolution, there had been chaos. So when Napoleon visited Liege, the Marquis made sure he attended the presentation and gave the First Consul his personal welcome.

Napoleon was swayed by him. Perhaps the fact they shared a common Italian-French  heritage played a good part into that. Certainly the First Consul’s opinion of the natives was quite shocking for he is reported as having said : “You Belgian are quite different from the French, Austrian, Dutch or English. You like yourselves too much and your main characteristics  are apathy and selfishness”. No wonder even to these days the dislike between the two nations is still latent !

During a visit to Turkey, the Marquis had developed a great taste for the oriental fashion. He loved the satin tunics, the turbans and yellow slippers and on his return home he regularly dressed as an Ottoman nobleman ,with turban and sabre. It is reported that after Napoleon had appointed him Mayor of Bruxelles, the Marquis attended meetings and received the local officials dressed as a Turk !  He also travelled in a carriage pulled by six horses and driven by coachmen with blackened faces.  His jaunts were such a great spectacle to watch that the desperate local impresarios had to beg the Marquis to reschedule his pleasure outings so that there would be no clash with the theatre performances, many of  which were being cancelled because of him.

Paolo Arconati’s admiration for Napoleon was such that he even attempted to erect a 100 meter tall pyramid on the road to Bruxelles-Mons, with the bust of his hero displayed at the top.  The material for the construction would have had to come from the demolition of the Amiens Cathedral. It was a foolish idea and was rejected,  of course. In the end, he had to settle for an arch of triumph erected in the middle of the park of his residence in Gaasbeek.

A physical description of the Marquis is provided in a report that an English officer wrote during the battle of Waterloo.   The 23rd Battalion of the King’s  Light Dragoons had been posted in Gaasbeek  and its commander had decided to turn the Marquis’s Castle into the sleeping quarters for the British officers. But when he arrived outside the Castle he was met by a bunch of reservists and farmers whom  the Marquis had assembled to protect his property. In perfect English, the Marquis asked the captain  why he wished to invade his home. The captain, being aware of the eccentricity of the Marquis’ character, removed  his hat in sign of respect and  explained that he was simply following the rules of war but that no harm would be brought to anyone there.  The gentlemanly manner with which the officer had spoken, greatly impressed the Marquis who then relented.

The British captain ‘s name was Mercer and he described the Marquis as a person with a tanned look and of above average height although , because of his age, his spine was a little curved. He was  otherwise quite active  and of a very alert mind and dressed like a Turk, with a dirty turban enriched by many precious stones. In his right hand he held a “lance” and in his left a horn. The old man was not only flamboyant but probably a little  deaf too !

The Marquis’ other residence in the centre of Bruxelles  had been occupied by the Allied Forces Commission whose members committed a considerable amount of damage, estimated in the region of 11,500 francs. The Marquis attempted to recover the sum from the Duke of Wellington but his claim was rejected and he sold off the property in disgust. After the Treaty of Vienna, William I (King of Holland) became the ruler  of the Low Countries. Paolo Arconati-Visconti had to lay low for a while as all privileges and noble titles from the old regime were abolished.  He became known simply as “citizen Arconati” until in 1816 King William restored  the Marquis tile to him. From then on he called himself Paul Marie Remy Arconati-Visconti, Marquis of Busto. It was however dutifully pointed out to him that a carriage pulled by 6 horses  was a privilege reserved only to  Kings. “No matter” he replied and he then ordered that his coach be pulled by only five horses plus a  mule !

The Marquis had a daughter , Sophie,  in 1789 but their relationship was rather strange right to the  very end. She addressed  him as  “tutor” or “guardian” but never as her father and he never recognised her as his child. Sophie went on to marry a Frenchman who fought with  General Lafayette. The couple  did not  inherit any part of  the Marquis’ fortune which went instead to Paolo’s nephew: Giuseppe Arconati-Visconti.

In his final days,  the old eccentric  Freemason slept in a coffin lined with  wool and red brocade to become  accustomed to the place where he would rest when his time came. But when in 1821 he suffered a heart attack, he was unable to reach for the sarcophagus; having climbed onto the nearest table , he laid himself there and died.  The Marquis Paul Arconati-Visconti was buried at Gaarsbeek and the epitaph on his tomb reads:

Man is born to enlighten his soul for only a very short time”.

— *** —

I based most of the material of this paper on an article written by P.J.Dawson, Past Grand Master of the Lodge of the Nine Muses in London. It had been translated into Italian and published in a Masonic magazine that I had seen displayed in a newspaper kiosk in Bologna over fifty years ago. My curiosity drove me to buy it, and I never anticipated I’d become a member of the Craft decades later. I hid it in a safe but forgotten part of my house, and it was only recently found by chance.


[1] Born in Romacoto near Bergamo , Italy,  in around 1727 or 1728 , Ruspini  came to England in 1750  and died here in December 1813. He was the founder in 1788 of a Charity now known as  the Royal Masonic Institution for Girls.

[2] This is a village 30 miles north east of Milano

[3] Alexander Louis Scockaert of Tirimont

[4] Dyle was a department of the First French Empire in what is now Belgium

The Prince of San Severo : a Freemason and a sorcerer

In the year 1748 the powerful King of Prussia Frederick II sent a letter of commendation[1] to a little known Italian nobleman who had written an essay called “Best practices of military operations for the foot soldiers”. The author was Raimondo di Sangro, Prince of San Severo born on 30th January 1710 in Torre Maggiore near the major town of Foggia, in the southern Italian Region of Apulia.

What Frederick did, however, was both astonishing and baffling. Did he not realise that by writing such letter he was on the one side disquietly exposing the incompetence of his generals and on the other praising the excellence of mind of a mere minor foreign aristocrat ?

Raimondo was admired in life not only for his knowledge of the military arts and for inventing a new type of archibugio[2] ; he was also an accomplished alchemist, a genius of technology, a philanthropist and amongst many other things also a high ranking Freemason. In our times the Prince’s family name  is  known in  Naples for its association with the Chapel of Sansevero, a shrine  that had been built by the Prince’s  ancestors  in 1590 and  magnificently  refurbished by him  between 1749 and 1771.

 

 

Museum of the Cappella_Sansevero, Naples
Museum of the Cappella_Sansevero, Naples

This wide angle picture shows that the inside of the Chapel in question contains several monuments, many of them beautiful and some also famous all over the world, like the “Veiled Christ” by the sculptor Giuseppe Sammartino. According to legend, that masterpiece was created  in 1753 by the artist working in a hypnotic state induced by the Prince who, after completion,  blinded the Sammartino to prevent him from replicating the secret technique applied to achieve such a stunning result. That exceptional sculpture represents Jesus Christ in death covered by a transparent looking marble shroud.

giuseppe-sanmartino-cristo-velado-1753

Some experts assert that the shroud and the subject were carved from one block of stone whilst legend states that Sammartino supplied the Prince with a suitable piece of cloth and the nobleman and alchemist , through a secret chemical process, transmuted it into that marble-like creation that covers the face and torso of the Christ.  Displayed in the Chapel is the “Disinganno” – or “Disillusionment” –  which is another excellent artwork that Raimondo commissioned to Francesco Queirolo[3].

disinganno_cappella_sansevero

He dedicated it to his father Antonio di Sangro whom, after years of turmoil  following the early death of his wife, returned to Naples in old age and committed the rest of his days to religious life.  The human figure is shown in the act of disentangling itself from a net representing the many human sins, whilst the globe symbolises the earthly passions and the little winged Genie embodies the human intellect whose help is offered to assists man in his quest. At the base of the monument there can also be seen an open Bible and a square with compass which, together with the terrestrial globe, are all allegories used in freemasonry.

The other pieces of art put on show in the Chapel are some beautiful sculptured  tributes to human virtues like modesty, decorum, truthfulness and sobriety, to mention but a few. To enlarge on what was the inspiration behind them would however be outside the scope of this paper.

Raimondo was the son of Antonio di Sangro, a noble Neapolitan and VII Prince of Sansevero and Cecilia Gaetani dell’Aquila di Aragona Sanseverino who also descended from an old patrician family.  Her ancestor Benedetto Gaetani [4] , to mention one, had become Pope Bonifacio VIII in 1294.  In fact Raimondo’s whole family genealogy is excellent; it stems from the Duke of Burgundy and has a connection with none other than the great Charlemagne!  Such an illustrious ancestry guaranteed the Prince a rightful presence at the Court of the King of Naples with whom he had become a close friend in youth.

At the age of ten Raimondo had been sent to Rome by his father to study mathematics, pyrotechnic, hydrostatics, philosophy, canon and civil laws, at the Jesuit convent “Clementino”. It was in that city that with the official consent of Pope Benedict XIV, Raimondo dedicated his time to the reading of the “forbidden books” kept in the Vatican vaults whence he derived that knowledge that he later applied in his secret experiments.

In 1730 the Prince returned to Naples and made that city his permanent home.

In 1734 Charles Bourbon,  Duke of Parma[5] , took Naples and the following year at the age of 18 was crowned its King as  Charles VII.   His installation on the throne marked the beginning of a long period of revival for the capital of southern Italy and flagged the start of the Prince of San Severo’s scientific activity to which the King was personally interested and had approved of.  It is said that Raimondo had gifted Charles with another of his inventions: a rainproof hat.

Prince of San Severo
Prince of San Severo

As the Colonel of his Regiment “Capitanata”, Raimondo di Sangro fought valiantly in 1744 at the battle of Velletri and with the defeat inflicted on the Habsburgs troops he played a big part in saving the Kingdom for Charles VII and the Bourbons.   It was during that time of war that Raimondo had written the essay that brought him the recognition from Frederick of Prussia.

The Prince was a modest man who had no vices, did not like excesses and was also of a liberal mind. An affable person, he was nonetheless at times unable to keep his impulsive temperament under control. He spoke several languages, including Arabic and Hebrew and printed books from the basement of his Palace in Naples which he had equipped with his own presses. Amongst those publications was “The Travel of Cyrus” by the famous Freemason Michael Ranmsay [6] which the Prince had translated into Italian. After the war against the Austrians, Raimondo returned to spend his days in his secret laboratory that he kept in the vaults of the Chapel, where he made discoveries which could have made him one of the most famous scientists of his time.

macchinaIn the crypt of the Sansevero Chapel in Naples are kept the bodies of a man and a woman which the Prince called “anatomical machines”. They are actually skeletons wrapped by the ensemble of veins that are present in a human body.  Chronicles report that the person, who injected the mysterious substance which forever preserved the vascular system of those corpses in a metallic-like state, might have been the anatomist Giuseppe Salerno from Palermo. But according to legend it was the Prince himself who experimented on his servants whilst they were still alive; hence the appellation of “sorcerer Prince” and “Devil’s apprentice” that stuck on him.macchinaanatomica

Although the Prince’s interests were mainly of a scientific and esoteric nature, he  also had a good sense of humour and did not shy away from playing a few pranks , one of which is the following.  The “Naples Gazette” dated 24 July 1770, reported that Raimondo di Sangro had built a splendid “Carrozza Marittima”, an amphibious carriage pulled by horses and capable of carrying up to twelve people and that such a marvel was seen defying the sea waves in Capo di Posillipo one sunny morning in July 1750.  In truth, as the Prince revealed, that splendid machine was nothing more than a raft on which had been attached a painted wooden façade cut out in the shape of a carriage. The horses that appeared to be pulling the carriage were made of cork and the wheels were spun by men hidden behind the disguise. It was a practical joke that not everyone accepted in the right spirit.   A year later, dueto  the prolonged and regular contact with the intoxicating chemicals that he used in his experiments, the Prince passed away.  This  practical joke of  the amphibious carriage might have been his amusing way of saying adieu to the world and to the people of Naples.

Chronicles report that amongst the many skills that Raimondo possessed, was also the ability of healing the sick with the use of remedies of his own preparation.  He successfully applied that dexterity on Luigi Sanseverino, Prince of Bisignano, by saving him from near death after the most talented doctors of Naples had given up any hope. Even Tanucci, the Chief Minister at the Court of Charles VII, notwithstanding his dislike for Raimondo – mostly for being a freemason and therefore an enlightened mind – summoned him when he fell ill.

Count Cagliostro
Count Cagliostro

Twenty or so years later, that famous celebrated charlatan, swindler and Freemason who called himself Count Cagliostro – aka Giuseppe Balsamo from Palermo, Sicily – would have become famous all over Europe for doing exactly as the Prince of San Severo: cure the sick with his own secret magic potions.  Except that  Cagliostro committed the error of applying his prowess of traumaturgo on the rich as well as the poor people, thus attracting on himself the scorn of the aristocracy who later embroiled him in various plots, the most famous of all being the affair of the missing necklace at the Court of King Louis XVI of France in 1781.

When the Prince became the Grand Master of the Order of the Freemasons for the Kingdom of Naples in 1750 he risked being excommunicated by Pope Benedict XIV.   In his defence he asserted that he had only gone into Freemasonry for he believed he was joining an operative order dedicated to the research and practice of Alchemy which was a subject that greatly interested him.  The reality was of course quite different because many Masonic lodges of the time also included in their list of members, some progressive, enlightened and revolutionary minds[7].  Instead of making a full mea culpa, Raimondo even dared reprehend the Church in a letter by accusing it of approving  idolatry – that pagan tradition of image worshipping – amongst the underprivileged population of the Kingdom and most particularly of the people of Naples.

Perhaps the legacy and influence of the di Sangros inside the Vatican and their noble lineage were stronger than one imagined for on that occasion the Prince, notwithstanding his blunders, was spared imprisonment and damnation.

Nonetheless,  accusations of witchcraft and black magic continued to press against him  ; the more so after he had claimed to have discovered a flame that could remain alive for an extensive period of  time, even months,  ”with the minimal lessening of the substance that fed it”.

The Prince wrote to the Florentine scientist Giovanni Giraldi that  he had made the discovery by chance during one of his experiments , when  a certain substance  extracted from  “…  the bone of the most noble creature on earth; the best one being that from the head…”  had caught fire.  As the noblest creature on earth was interpreted to be man, we realise why there was never any truce in the war that his enemies engaged again the Prince!  The only records that the Prince left us of that imperishable light are some sketches preserved in the Biblioteca Nazionale. The issue has left perplexed scholars in every age .

The Prince’s laboratory was locked up just before  his death and never re-open  ;  the Chapel and his Palace  have since  remained in the hands of the Sansevero family which has never allowed for any  investigations to take place there.  According to another legend, when the Raimondo di Sangro felt that his days were coming to an end he gave instructions that after death his body should be cut in seven pieces by his servant and laid into a coffin whence he would resurrect nine months later. However  his family , either fearful that the exercise could have come good and thereafter labelled all the Sanseveros as followers of the Devil or simply anxious to check on the progress of things , put an early end to the experiment by opening the tomb before time.

The Prince’s death has remained very much a mystery even to these days. His mortal remains and his actual place of rest – other than the official tomb seen in the Chapel – have not yet been discovered.

 The author forbids any reproduction or publication of this article, in full or in part, without his explicit authorisation.


[1] Legler, Rolf (1990). Der Golf von Neapel (in German). Cologne: DuMont Buchverlag. p. 135

[2] Italian word for  the predecessor of the musket though it was easier and lighter than that to carry

[3]  He was an Italian sculptor born in Genoa in 1704. He was  active in Rome  and  Naples

[4] Born in Anagni in 1235 and died in  Rome in 1303

[5] He was the fifth son of  Philip V King of Spain but eldest by his second wife Elisabetta Farnese

[6] G.D. Henderson: “Chevalier Ramsay” Thomas Nelson and Sons London, 1952.  Michael Ramsay

(9 July 1686 – 6 May 1743) was born in Scotland but spent most of his life in France

[7] To read more about Freemasonry in the Kingdom of Naples in the XVIII century, read my paper entitled “Freemasonry under the shadow of the Vesuvius” of future release.

The Masonic Lodge : an explanation of the traditional opening hour

 For the ancient Romans a new day would begin at midnight, for the Greeks it would start at sunset and for the Egyptians at dawn.

The hours are an ancient invention and were codified by the Greeks in the 5th century B.C. by measuring the distance that the sun covers in the sky.

But it took the Romans around two hundred more years to eventually feel the need to count the number of hours present in the day and another century after that,  to finally define them with some precision.

Until the end of 400 B.C. the Romans were still dividing the day in two parts rather than into hours; one part was that period of light that came before midday, the other part was filled with the hours of darkness.

In ancient Rome “Herald” was the title given to an official messenger of the Consuls. The one, who was posted high up on a hill, would monitor the passage of the sun at its meridian point and then instantly notify the population by blowing his trumpet. That signal indicated that labour – which had begun at dawn – could now be stopped.

trumpet

The Spanish born Roman lawyer and politician Seneca, better known for his philosophical discourses and letters, stated that at the time of the Roman Empire no one knew the exact time. The lack of precision of the mechanical gadgets that were in use – like the Greek sun-dialler and the water clock or “clepsydra” [1]  – made such a thing impossible. But so too did the following idiosyncrasies.

Continue reading The Masonic Lodge : an explanation of the traditional opening hour

The two St Johns and Freemasonry

The Masonic ritual makes references to both St Johns the Baptist and St John the Evangelist and it also contains the principle that the Bible must be kept open on the Gospel in an open Lodge.

According to Paul Naudon [1], author of the book “Les Loges de Saint-Jean”, the origin of this tradition is in great part influenced by the Knights Templar and more particularly so by the Knights Hospitalier who assimilated the former when they were officially suppressed in March 1312 by King Philip IV of France.

The Knights Templar, whose motto was “obedience, poverty and chastity”, were established as an Order in Jerusalem around the year 1118 for the purpose of safeguarding the Christian civilization in the Orient and protecting the life of the pilgrims who visited the Holy Land.  The Order comprised of the most formidable fighting Crusaders  as well as non fighting members who were skilled in economic and religious matters. The fathers of the Order had received their Chart from Teocleto, Patriarch of Jerusalem, who was also the 67th successor of St John in that role.

Saint John became the Patron of the Templars and on 24th June of each year the whole population of masons, carpenters and various other craftsmen clebrated him with the lighting of bonfires by the Grand Master of the Order. This custom was retained even after the dissolution of the Order and St John effectively became the Patron of both the Order and of the masons.

But who where the two Saints John?

Continue reading The two St Johns and Freemasonry

Handel’s character of Zoroastro in the Opera “Orlando”

In the London of the XVIII century, Freemasonry was a  predominant and mysterious movement present in society.

Freemasonry was officially born in London in 1717, when the first United Grand Lodge of England was established there.

By the year 1735 there were well over one hundred lodges in the Capital, many of them characterised by a mixed membership of middle-class individuals, clergymen and aristocrats.

Indeed, many Grand Masters came from the nobility and have contributed in no small part to the success of the Order. They played a reassuring role in the mind of the population who assumed that ,with such a distinguished list of names to its record,  Freemasonry could not be a subversive and dangerous sect.

Such awareness in turn made people  wanting to learn more about that secretive society which , for at least a while longer, remained free from persecution.

Freemasonry’s notoriety reached such a peak as to having its meeting advertised both in the London press and in the pamphlets  distributed and read in the London coffee houses.

And with people’s curiosity growing insatiable, Freemasons were happy to be playing into the phenomenon by even appearing in public celebrations.

From 1721 to 1747 a much splendid procession for the Masonic Grand Festival was held yearly in the streets of London. Bands of musicians accompanied the Brethren from the house of the Master Elected to the place (a Hall or most likely a Tavern) where he would be installed in the chair of Solomon. They marched two by two dressed in their aprons and jewels and carrying the emblems and banners of the Craft, followed by the nobility being transported in their rich carriages.

In such a climate it was no surprise that music composers, poets and librettists – many of whom were themselves members of the Craft – choose to incorporate elements from our Society’s symbolism and ideology in their work.

In that respect ,  much has been written about Mozart’s Opera “The Magic Flute”, but  less about the work of another highly successful music composer of the time, the  German George Fridiric Handel [1] who was born in the same town and year as another great composer : Johann Sebastian Bach.

Continue reading Handel’s character of Zoroastro in the Opera “Orlando”

Ianus

The word Ianus in Latin means “door” . In ancient times Ianus was a “God” associated with the Sun and traditionally better identified as the protector of every “beginning” and every “transition”.

Not surprisingly the first month of our calendar year is called Janu(ary) or Ianu(ariu)s in Latin.
In addition to being depicted with two faces – each looking into the other’s opposite direction – Ianus was also shown holding two keys.
One key was made of gold , the other was made of silver and they respectively symbolised the “great” and the “small” mysteries. The Catholic world adopted the symbol of the two keys – we can see them on the flag of the Vatican – and gave them the meaning of the union between the spiritual power (gold) and the temporal one (silver) both held by the Pontiff.
Continue reading Ianus

Freemasonry and the Ars Structoria

Ever since man took his first steps to evolution and left behind  his condition of ignorance, he has had the capacity  to remember and a desire to tell his experiences to his fellow creatures.  In other words he has always felt the need to pass down the wisdom that cascades from his forbearers’ actions.

The conquering nations needed to instil fear and respect in the hearts and minds of the subdued people. They needed to accomplish this  so that they may have retained control over them  and  to achieve it they built permanent reminders of their military prowess and of the achievements of their  political leaders.

At the same time  the conquerors, finding  the need to integrate the capitulated people , imposed on them their traditions, their religious belief and – where present –  their legislation or rules of obedience.

In essence, they  passed on  their “Ars Vitae”.

Continue reading Freemasonry and the Ars Structoria